Germany has long maintained an unofficial but firm political consensus: no cooperation with the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in parliamentary votes. That consensus may now be cracking. Reports suggest that lawmakers from the center-right CDU in Saxony-Anhalt potentially voted in favour of an AfD candidate for parliamentary speaker — a move Germany's Social Democrats (SPD) have described as a "unique breach of taboos." For expats and immigrants living in Germany, this development is worth watching closely. The AfD's platform has consistently targeted immigration policy, and any normalization of its political role could signal shifts in the country's legislative direction.
According to reports, CDU lawmakers in the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt may have cast votes in support of an AfD candidate running for the position of parliamentary speaker. While the details of individual votes in a secret ballot can be difficult to verify, the outcome was striking enough to prompt public alarm from the SPD, which characterized the situation as a "unique breach of taboos."
The so-called "firewall" — the informal agreement among mainstream German parties not to rely on AfD votes or support AfD candidates — has been a defining feature of German parliamentary politics in recent years. If CDU members did cross that line, even partially, it represents a notable moment in the country's political landscape.
It is important to note that the exact number of votes involved has not been confirmed in the available reporting, and the CDU has not formally acknowledged the alleged crossover votes. The matter remains contested.
The AfD has built much of its political identity around a restrictive stance on immigration, asylum policy, and what it describes as "remigration" — a term that has alarmed civil society groups and human rights organizations. Any move that strengthens the AfD's institutional standing, even at the state level, raises legitimate questions about the direction of German politics.
For immigrants living in Germany — whether on a work visa, a residence permit, or in the process of Einbürgerung — this is not an abstract political story. The parties that control state and federal parliaments shape the laws governing Aufenthaltstitel renewals, integration funding, Integrationskurs availability, and the powers of the Ausländerbehörde. Shifts in political alliances at the state level can foreshadow changes at the federal level.
It is also worth noting that Germany's political system has checks and balances. A single state-level vote, even if the allegations are confirmed, does not immediately change federal law. But it does matter as a signal of where political boundaries may be moving.
The SPD's warning about a "breach of taboos" reflects a broader anxiety within centrist and left-leaning political circles about the gradual normalization of the AfD. Civil society organizations, journalists, and anti-discrimination groups have been monitoring this trend for some time. The reaction to the Saxony-Anhalt reports suggests that scrutiny of CDU-AfD proximity will remain intense.
For expats who want to follow this story, reputable German-language and English-language news outlets covering German politics — such as DW, Der Spiegel, and The Local — are good places to track developments as they unfold.
Not directly or immediately. State parliament speaker elections do not alter federal immigration law. However, political developments at the state level can influence the broader political climate and future legislative priorities, so it is worth monitoring.
Current German immigration law remains in force. If you have concerns about how political changes might affect your specific situation, consulting a qualified immigration lawyer or contacting your local Ausländerbehörde is advisable. Do not rely on political news alone to assess your personal legal status.
The firewall refers to an informal agreement among Germany's mainstream parties — CDU/CSU, SPD, Greens, FDP, and others — not to form coalitions with the AfD or rely on its votes to pass legislation or elect officials. It is a political norm rather than a legal rule, which is why allegations of violations cause significant controversy.
The reported events in Saxony-Anhalt are a reminder that Germany's political landscape is shifting, and that expats and immigrants should stay informed. The immediate impact on your daily life, paperwork, or legal status is likely minimal — but the longer-term direction of German politics on immigration is shaped by exactly these kinds of political moments.
Stay engaged with reliable news sources, know your rights, and if you have specific concerns about your immigration status, seek advice from a qualified legal professional or contact BAMF.
Source: DW English
Want news like this in your inbox?
The most relevant news for expats in Germany, no noise.
More than 100 migrants died in a shipwreck off the coast of Djibouti. A similar number are still missing. The victims were hoping for a better life on the Arabian Peninsula.
Germany's governing coalition is struggling with low approval ratings and a reform backlog. Here's why expats should pay attention to the political situation.
Austrian far-right activist Martin Sellner has set up an 'Institute for Remigration' in Germany. Opposition parties are calling on the government to ban it. Here's what this means.
